Colorado
Menu
Gradient overlay

Racism in Branding

Written by
Rob Stefanski
Published
May 4, 2015
Categories

Each year we seem to hear about the issue of racism in sports brands particularly those with Native American mascots such as the Washington Redskins, Cleveland Indians, Chicago Blackhawks, Atlanta Braves and Kansas City Chiefs. Throughout the history of each of these franchises, their logos have been altered. USA Today recently showed the evolution of the logos for each team.

braves

You’ll notice how the Atlanta Braves logo has depicted various iterations of a Native American from cherry red-colored skin to a “screaming Indian,” and then finally dropping the icon altogether and replaced with a tomahawk. The team has kept the Braves name which still is offensive to many people.

blackhawks

Chicago Blackhawks logo

redskins

Washington Redskins logo

Some teams have decided to keep Native American imagery while getting rid of red fleshtones.

 

indians

Cleveland Indians logo

chiefs

Kansas City Chiefs

Other teams have replaced offensive imagery with other icons or lettering. Is this enough? In an interview with Co. Design, National Congress of American Indians deputy director Robert Holden explained that the “neutrality” of lettering and icons is purely subjective. “The team still owns the mascot or logo. Without a meaningful dialogue with Native peoples that includes tribal officials, Native educators, and others, these ‘changes’ are disingenuous at best. They certainly have not communicated a willingness to broach the subject with Native peoples. That gives reason to think that they are not voluntarily going to change, and believe that their PR and branding team can get away with what they may think is a more benign form of racism and stereotyping.”

This racism in branding presents a unique design challenge and an opportunity to solve a problem that has been around for decades. Where do we draw the line between tradition, heritage and racism? Is there a solution that can honor longtime fans yet be respectful and non-offensive to Native peoples? Who should be involved in the design process if these team logos were to be rebranded? Clearly the controversy won’t be going away any time soon but thankfully the conversation continues. It will be interesting to see how and if these brands will evolve and how design will provide the solution to this important challenge.

 

header image from: nbcnews.com

Comments
AIGA encourages thoughtful, responsible discourse. Please add comments judiciously, and refrain from maligning any individual, institution or body of work. Read our policy on commenting.
LOADING...
Your browser is too old to view this site.

Do yourself a favor and upgrade it to the latest version.